toggle

AAPL Stock: 509.46 ( + 6.86 )

Apple, iTunes could stay in France

updated 04:30 pm EDT, Tue May 9, 2006

French iTunes law changes


A newly proposed amendment may offer Apple some reprieve in France, following industry speculation that the company would likely pull out of the market before sharing its FairPlay DRM technologies with rivals. A new amendment offered by the French Senate would allow Apple to maintain its iPod/iTunes ecosystem if it were to negotiate deals with record labels and artists and obtain their authorization to use FairPlay DRM to copy-protect the songs its sells through iTunes. The draft Senate amendment, expected to be voted on this week, would allow Apple keep its FairPlay DRM proprietary if it were approved by the artists and the copyright holders themselves. Although Apple, which called the bill "state-sponsored piracy," would be required to renegotiate contracts, the proposed change would create a regulatory authority to oversee the exclusive music formats.

That governing body would have the power to order that exclusive file formats be shared if it was believed that the obstacles the DRM imposes are "additional to, or independent of, those explicitly decided by the copyright holders," according to The San Jose Mercury News. The loophole could allow Apple to continue to sell songs and the iPods in the country, after obtaining the necessary authorizations.

Both consumer groups and the government backed the initial version of the bill, which was passed in March by France's National Assembly, which required companies to share their DRM and copyright technologies with rivals. France's efforts are to keep the market from being dominated by a single vendor or company. The proposed law has the support of the French Minister of Culture, Renaud Donnedieu de Vabres, while Apple's stance has earned the support of US Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez.

Songs sold from Apple's iTunes can only be used on its iPod, similar to Sony's ATRAC3 files that can only be played on its own music players; however, Sony's file format has a much lower adoption rate compared to iTunes, which dominates virtually all markets with marketshare of more than 70 percent in the US, and has a significant impact in many other international markets.

Although the music labels have been trying to regain control of the digital music market, Apple's iTunes and iPod ecosystem has maintained a stranglehold, but also kept pricing at a single, fixed rate of $0.99. Music labels have wanted to increase the price on popular songs, while lowering the prices of others, but were unsuccessful in their bid, as Apple recently renewed its iTunes contracts that Jobs' desire for fixed pricing on all songs.


by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. kw99

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Nov 2001

    0

    "loophole"

    The article says:

    "The loophole could allow Apple to continue to sell songs and the iPods in the country, after obtaining the necessary authorizations."

    Sounds like the law is designed that way, not as a "loophole," which implies Apple would need to do something that was not intended to "get around" the law.

    Also, how does this effect Apple selling iPods in France. Even if Apple pulled iTMS out of France, the French law is surely not so anti-Apple-specific that Apple could not sell an "MP3-player" with no DRM. Just bundle it with an iTMS-less version of iTunes. Then iPod can be sold as a player for any MP3 or AAC or even Windows Media file (after conversion), as long as they are not DRM'ed.

    That's what Apple should do, really. The potential profit from iTMS in the French market may not be worth the expense managing this... Are the saying each (separate) artist must give authorization to Apple? Might as well take the studios out of the picture.

  1. JulesLt

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2005

    0

    MP3

    Actually, one objection I do have to iTMS is that they DO add Fairplay onto all files, even when the artists sell their music as non-DRM'd MP3 files through other sites (Playlouder / Bleep / etc). There doesn't seem to be a good excuse for that, other than 'not confusing the customer' of course!

    The law is not anti-Apple. The law is actually a DMCA like legislation that restricts consumers rights and is pro-DRM. The 'anti-Apple' bit is itself an amendment to ensure consumers are protected against companies.

    Apple are just the people who it would impact most now, but let's remember that in 5-10 years almost all media will come in some form of DRM protected channel. I for one want laws that will allow me to legally transfer that content onto my Apple system.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

10 Most Read

Recent Reviews

Logitech Cube

The world of mice could often be described charitably as stagnant: it's an endless sea of ergonomic shapes that assume you're sitting ...

NewerTech and Targus USB Hubs For Gifts

A useful holiday present to resolve an ongoing frustration is a multi-port hub. Whether as a stocking stuffer, Chanukah present, or an ...

X-Rite ColorMunki Photo

Color calibration is the art of tweaking your monitor so that the colors represented on screen better match real life and your printer ...

toggle

Most Commented

10 Most Discussed