04/17/2006, 8:35am, EDT
Monday, April 17th
Jobs declines Wozniak book request
Wozniak described himself as more of an inventor/engineer, while Jobs was a businessman and visionary.
"Even when Apple really got started we weren't close friends because he had a different motivation in the company, which was to run a company, and mine was just to be a top engineer that did clever, clever projects," he said. "So we almost never saw each other in the company."
Responding to Apple's new Boot Camp technology that allows users to select either Windows or Mac OS X during startup on its new Intel-based Macs, Wozniak said that he was not impressed.
"I don't think anything of it at all. You know, people say a bunch of PC people will now buy Macs. No. What I really want is just a window that I can go back and forth instantly. I don't have to reboot," he responded. The Woz, as he is affectionately known, said that he uses Microsoft's Virtual PC on his PowerPC-based Mac, which allows him to instantly switch between the environments--without rebooting--although he does admit the software is slow.
Microsoft says it is still evaluating the future of Virtual PC for Intel-based Macs.
Filed under: Apple
,
, 15
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
Or, maybe he thought the book boring or that he may have disagreed with Woz's perception of events, and decided that endorsing it would lessen his own credibility when it comes to business thought. Who knows.
-- Len
The shame of it is that we will never get Jobs on record to respond to some of the more interesting aspects of his history, or that of the company.
He didn't make any big deal out of the twentieth anniversary of the Mac two years ago, and he opted not to publically celebrate the 30th anniversary of Apple.
I think he just tends to look forward and not back.
He also seems to be a very private person. To reflect upon the past might just be a bit more personal than he would like to be.
At the very least, it adds to his mystique. And I'm sure he knows that.
Wow, if you're that bothered by bad speling and gramar, the internet is not a place four you. And did you really have to define what those words mean for everyone. I mean, the first poster said it was mispelled. So not only do you think everyone cant spell, but all the people hear on the bored aren't completely illeterate as well.
And what "credibility of the site" are you talking about? The same site that's 'reporting' about Steve Jobs not writing a Foreword? (You do realize that everyday goes by without Jobs writing a Foreword? So isn't this just more of the same?)
Or the same site that just reported about the hurt feelings of a 9 year old girl.