Lawyers: iPod update acknowledges flaw
updated 05:35 pm EST, Wed March 29, 2006
Apple acknowledges flaw?
Attorneys representing iPod owners in a national class-action lawsuit today said that by introducing a limitation on volume control, Apple has acknowledged that its iPod line is flawed. "It is good to know that Apple finally acknowledges that there is a serious flaw with its iPod product, and is giving U.S. purchasers the same protection it has been giving French purchasers since 2002," said Steve Berman, an attorney representing the plaintiffs. "Unfortunately, this patch doesn't help the millions of people who own older models -- it is a jack-legged workaround that falls well short of what consumers demand and deserve."
Apple has admitted that its patch is compatible only with its fifth-generation iPod and iPod nano, though a congressman today applauded the company for introducing the safety measures. The suit was originally filed January 31st, and claims that Apple's iPod causes hearing loss, that the company does not adequately warn users of the risks, and that the design of its white earbud phones worsen inherent risks.
In 2002, Apple was forced to pull devices from stores in France after the country imposed a limit of 100 decibels (DB) for personal listening devices. Shortly afterwards, the company introduced updated software that limited the volume output, but did not offer similar safeguards in the U.S.
Apple devices can reach 130 DB -- comparable to an air raid siren -- well beyond safe listening levels, according to the complaint filed in January. The suit points to studies which indicate that hearing loss may occur after 28 seconds of sound at 115 DB.
"While the software allows users to set levels, the company does next to nothing to educate consumers about what is safe," said J.R. Whaley, another attorney representing the plaintiffs. "Many consumers would conclude that 100 DB is twice as loud as 50 DB but that's not the case; for every 10 decibels, the loudness actually increases twofold. Fifty decibels is twice as loud as 40, 60 is four times as loud as 40, and so on."
The plaintiff is seeking compensation for hearing loss and upgrades that will make the iPods safer, citing the company's early compliance efforts for sound volume in France.
"We contend that Apple has done next to nothing to inform consumers regarding these issues," Berman concluded.












Oh good lord...
03/29, 06:02pm reply
...next think you know smokers will be sueing cigarette makers...
bsaxton
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jan 2000
1000 Lawyers
03/29, 06:17pm reply
this is 1000 Lawyers at the bottom of the ocean is a good start.
dscottbuch
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Sep 2000
Oh no...
03/29, 06:17pm reply
if a human being is born who is too stupid to find out:
- that the coffee at McDonald's might be hot (or coffee in general for that matter)
- that it is not a good idea to dry your pet in a microwave
- how to adjust an iPod's volume,
that person will sooner or later find out that the US is a moron's paradise (and every lawyer's paradise). How about accepting a little responsibility for the way you interact with your environment? I don't get it.
RalphS
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Feb 2002
This just makes me mad
03/29, 06:23pm reply
These money sucking leeches don't care about the consumer. The fact that they give this back hand slap to Apple for addressing their concerns is just proof positive that they are in it for the money. As if there was ever any doubt.
fletcher
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jul 2005
what an a******
03/29, 06:23pm reply
"While the software allows users to set levels, the company does next to nothing to educate consumers about what is safe," said J.R. Whaley
Also car companies doesn't tell you that standing in front of a fast moving car is bad for your health....
I.P. Freely
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: May 2003
Lawyer type morons...
03/29, 06:30pm reply
What is it with these morons and stuff like this? I agree with ralphs and his post here.
My problem is why is it only Apple that has been singled out? I don't see volume limits on other mp3 players, TVs, or Movie theaters, car stereos etc. If the person is stupid enough to listen to loud music, well that is their own fault. Heck, go to any concert and I'll guarantee the music will be very loud also.
Aren't people supposed to take responsibility for what they do instead of blaming problems on others? Doesn't Apple have a warning or something in the iPod user manual about volume? Legally I would think that would shield them from any kind of lawsuit like this.
t6hawk
Dedicated MacNNer
Joined: Jan 2001
What?
03/29, 06:31pm reply
I can’t here you. I have a 3G iPod!
rspress
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Dec 2002
There's a flaw alright
03/29, 06:33pm reply
But it has more to do with the legal system than the iPod.
They make it sound like there is no possible legitimate use for volume levels that high.
Not everyone listens through headphones (I almost never do), and you remove the headphones (literally and figuratively) and this argument is flat our ridiculous.
ADeweyan
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Mar 2004
law 101
03/29, 06:35pm reply
Last ditch effort! Funny how any other lawyer can argue that this in no way an admission of guilt, only providing a new feature in response to a public demand. If a whole group of people were complaining about the ipod being too bright and hurting people's eyes, Apple might similarly release a brightness limiter in response. Try again layers, your case is sinking....
gamato
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Mar 2005
another thing...
03/29, 06:39pm reply
I use studio grade headphones to listen to the music from my ipod (high impedence) which means I NEED to crank my volume to get an acceptable listening level. How about that for an legitimate use for having high volume levels available on my ipod?
gamato
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Mar 2005