apple news/media reports

03/10/2006, 11:00am, EST

Friday, March 10th

Transitive defends Rosetta speed

Transitive, the developer of the technology that lies beneath Apple's Rosetta software, defended the fact that certain key Mac applications--such as Adobe Photoshop--perform at sub-par levels in the eyes of some users. "If you use performance intensive applications, or if you are a professional user and you are going to use certain applications in a way that is computationally intensive, you will see some loss in performance. But we think that that's a relatively small percentage of the users, and a small percentage of the applications. For the vast majority of users, we think that Quick Transit delivers more than sufficient performance," said Bob Wiederhold, CEO of Transitive. Apple's new Intel-based Macs easily outperform their older siblings when running native Universal Binary applications, but in many cases fail to perform even as well as the older models when running non-Universal Binary applications such as Adobe Photoshop or Cinema 4D, according to Macworld UK.


Filed under: Apple

, , 15comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz


15 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All   Global Settings
Quick Transit
0
03/10, 11:24am, EST
Quick Transit is a good name for a bran cereal, not a high tech product...
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2002
User is offline
Add More RAM
0
03/10, 11:30am, EST
Rosetta is fine, it's just RAM hungry is all. If you must run a high volume of PPC apps on an Intel based Mac, you really need to max out the system RAM to 2GB. Most typical consumers will be fine with 1GB though as they won't be doing heavy Photoshop work on one, that's what a Power Mac G5 is for.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Apr 2004
User is offline
Let's get real
0
03/10, 11:31am, EST
I don't understand the expectation that any application running via emulation or translation of some sort should be faster than the native version. The only people who are "disappointed" in Rosetta's performance are those who don't understand the situation to begin with and have unrealistic expectations.

Transitive has no obligation to defend Rosetta. It works as advertised.
Junior Member
Joined Nov 1999
User is offline
Cooliest ever.
0
03/10, 11:54am, EST
Transitive makes the COOLEST technology every, why anyone would put them on the defensive about it is beyond me. DO YOU REALIZE? THAT A POWERPC APPLICATION is running fine on an entirely different processor just by double clicking it? It runs very fast when you think about what's going on. The technology BLOWs my mind.

Think about the mechanics of it... Rosetta rocks, and so does transitive.
Senior User
Joined Mar 2004
User is offline
Small amount?
0
03/10, 11:54am, EST
This "small percentage of users" is actually the Mac's key demographic. These are the same people that would use a Mac just because these applications run faster. If they run much slower on a new mac, why not just use a PC running windows that will get native speed with no need for emulation?
Forum Regular
Joined Aug 2001
User is offline
They are kidding right?
0
03/10, 12:01pm, EST
Rosetta performs exceptionally well. Compare it to , say, an emulation product like Virtual PC, and it is clearly a generation ahead in performance. Any criticism should be levelled directly at Adobe and their lame excuses for not having a Universal version available sooner.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Oct 2001
User is offline
No way to experience it
0
03/10, 12:01pm, EST
I have been to several Apple Stores, and they do not have any MACTEL's running Photoshop, Dreamweaver, FLASH, FireWorks etc. I would love to boost it to 2GB, but I need to actually experience the speed (or lack thereof). It may be just as good as my 1.5 GHz G4 Powerbook with 1GB, but I do not plan on dropping the dough just yet.

Any word on a 17" MacBookPro (like the name I do not)
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined May 2005
User is offline
Cinema 4D?
0
03/10, 12:29pm, EST
Nobody should be running Cinema 4D under Rossetta, There is an Intel Mac version as a free upgrade.
Professional Poster
Joined Jan 2001
User is offline
SO?
0
03/10, 1:20pm, EST
"DO YOU REALIZE? THAT A POWERPC APPLICATION is running fine on an entirely different processor just by double clicking it? It runs very fast when you think about what's going on. The technology BLOWs my mind. "

It's emulation. I have PearPC on my work PC. It runs OSX 10.3 pretty well - the only thing that stinks is disk access - that's abysmally slow. And this is a 3 year old laptop running PPC, not a new "faster" architecture. Furthermore, this software was created by the open source community, not commercial developers.

Rosetta is cool, but it's just emulation.
Forum Regular
Joined Apr 2005
User is offline
Works great for me
0
03/10, 2:02pm, EST
I'm very happy with the performance of non-native applications on my Intel iMac. It's still a lot faster than my PowerBook G4.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined May 1999
User is offline
additional comments:..1..2..Next
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

RSS Feeds

Have the latest content delivered to your desktop via RSS. Use the links below to get access to a specific blog, news, or reviews feed.



  MacNN -all

  MacNN Reviews

  MacNN Podcasts

  iPodNN

  Electronista

  Left Lane News
Want To Sell Your Laptop? Any Condition - receive Top Cash. Get an instant quote. Free shipping www.CashForLaptops.com
Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.