01/14/2006, 2:40pm, EST
Saturday, January 14th
MS working with Apple on future of VPC
"Virtual PC 7 remains the top emulation software for Mac PowerPC users. However, applications like Virtual PC that are highly dependent on the OS will not run under Rosetta," said Roz Ho, General Manager of Macintosh Business Unit (Mac BU) at Microsoft.
"These types of products require a dedicated team and a lot of work to rebuild them for an entirely new architecture. That said, we know that using Windows-based applications on Macs is important to our customers, and we’re working with Apple to figure out the best way to bring this technology to Intel-based Macs. We’ll have a better idea once we have the new machines and can accurately evaluate just what is required to transition the product."
The company also said that the Universal Binary transition may affect the timing of the next release of Mac Office and Mac Messenger. Although it plans to deliver Entourage and Messenger updates in March, these will not be native Intel applications.
"We typically deliver new versions every two to three years, as this timeframe is when the majority of customers are ready for new productivity software. Moving to universal binaries will naturally impact our schedule, but we’re dedicated to bringing Office for Mac and Messenger for Mac to customers and making sure we deliver the highest quality products. We’ll know just how much the schedule will need to shift as soon as we’re able to fully test our current and forthcoming solutions on Intel-based Macs."
Ho said that the Mac BU will focus on file format compatibility--the primary conern of its users--by bringing new XML file formats, and improved layout engines and graphics and will work with Apple to identify new technologies that will benefit its customers.
Filed under: software
Other story tags: business software
,
, 26
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
Also, Microsoft Office kind of sucks. They needed to do a lot of work to get the PowerPC version working well...now to also have to port to Intel...should make it suck even more!
Apple -- please call VMware and stop playing around with MS on this issue. VMware is a far superior product to virtual pc in every way.
On a related note -- for those of you who want Windows to "run like classic macos": YOU DO NOT WANT THIS! Think about this -- Windows, running on the same disk partition as OS X... No thank you -- this opens OS X to the many existing and future vulnerabilities in Windows and its various future incarnations. You want a separate or virtual disk similar to what VPC and VMware use so when Windows craps out, you can revert to the most recent disk snapshot and continue where you left off.
If they wanted it, they'd have Intel versions available today. The answer is, they don't want to. Windows is their preferred market and Macs will always be second-class citizens as far as M$ is concerned.
I agree a non-Microsoft solution (VMWare or whatever) to running Windows within the MacOS is the way to go.