tech industry
11/21/2005, 5:30pm, EST
Monday, November 21st
Should Apple offer Mac OS X to all?
Linux columnist Tom Adelstein says if Apple made Mac OS X for Intel available to consumers to install on their PCs, it would "change the PC landscape like no other operating system has or could." Adelstein believes Apple should "open-source their operating system, port Openoffice.org to Aqua and bundle it for Intel PC's [...] and the world will say goodbye to Windows for good." If Mac OS X took over from Linux as the alternative operating system of choice to Windows, all would not be lost for Linux fans: "all the starving Linux developers would have a chance to make some money porting 17,000 packages to OS X, servicing them and selling them. Because, enterprises would move to Apple within a moment's notice and without hesitation. Apple's eco-system would grow and Steve would prosper like never before."
Filed under: industry
,
, 22
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
"Apple's eco-system would grow and Steve would prosper like never before."
No, no it wouldn't. Apple makes half its money off of HARDWARE (The other half is iPod, and a minuscule amount is software.) Apple funds its OSX development with HARDWARE sales. Apple pushes OSX to sell HARDWARE. Apple makes OSX better because its tied to the HARDWARE.
That's what these people don't realize. They want to enjoy OSX without paying for it. And Apple's entire "ecosystem" is based off this.
This is also why I'm opposed to the Intel transition. Regardless of how much Apple locks down OSX, it will never be enough, and now geeks can get OSX without paying for it(well, not entirely for it).
we need: average profit per computer sold and and estimated number of people that would switch.
microsoft makes quite a bit of money off it's os sales, so it's not like it's a crazy unproven concept.
This guy is a tech geek and has no idea of Apple's company structure, and how vitial their hardware sales are to the company's bottom line. Apple would go out of business if it relied on OS sales alone.
But it won't happen for at least another year. It would make no sense to release it until all of those Mac 86 applications are ported over and the problems are all shaken out. Letting it out now would not allow it to reach critical mass and only result in a flood of criticism due to the lack of things to run.
All in due time... all in due time.
People don't buy PCs for games any more - they buy a Playstation or xBox for that.
Apple is headed in the right direction - if they could just find a way to make their systems just a little more affordable without breaking the bank, they can continue to make strides. There are enough people who want out of the Windows nightmare to support them.