toggle

AAPL Stock: 562.29 ( -3.03 )

Mac OS X inherently secure, hackers not interested

updated 08:35 am EDT, Mon October 24, 2005

Mac OS X inherently secure


Successful assaults by on the Mac operating system are rare as it has better security and attackers are less keen, says Stephen Wildstrom of BusinessWeek. "There is endless debate among security experts about whether the paucity of successful assaults on Apple's OS X is attributable to better security or attackers' lack of interest in an operating system whose share of the market is in single digits. I think it's some of both." Wildstrom says one reason Mac OS X offers inherently better security is that it was designed with relatively little concern for compatibility with earlier versions, while Windows is full of compromises so that it works with older and less secure operating systems. Wildstrom also points out that "the ablest writers of viruses, spyware, and worms, are motivated more by profit than glory, and Windows, with 90%-plus of the market, is where the money is."


by MacNN Staff

toggle

Comments

  1. telem

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Dec 1999

    0

    Where is the money?

    How do hackers profit from their success?

  1. TomMcIn

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Dec 2001

    0

    Hacking OSX

    While the glory from hacking millions of sloppy Windows systems is one thing, the glory from breaking into a secure OSX system would be worth a lot more points. Anybody can stroll down the street, few climb Mount Everest, and then only with a huge support team.

    Tom

  1. eswinson

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2002

    0

    This is BS

    The real reason we see a lack of virii and worms for the mac is that there are not the ready made script generators for the mass "hackers" to use nor do most of them even have access to a mac to create a script generator to begin with. The responsible approach to security apple has taken as well as the quick release of security patches when holes are identified have prevented a proliferation of malware on the platform.

    Funny nobody ever said OpenVMS was unhackable becuse of its small marketshare. They say it is is unhackable becuase nobody was able to hack it.

    The Irony here is that Windows NT was derived from VMS... go figure.

  1. Jonas Maebe

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2002

    0

    Re: Where is the money?

    It's not hackers, but crackers and virus writers. And they profit by renting out botnets (large networks of zombie PC's gotten under control with the help of spyware or viruses, rented e.g. to spammers for their use), capturing credit card info using installed key loggers, extortion by threatening with denial-of-service attacks using their botnets etc.

    And although I agree Mac OS X is inherently a bit more secure than Windows, it probably wouldn't be that difficult to have a wide spreading virus on the Mac.

    The reason is that I do not think it is difficult to trick most people into entering their admin password in a fake authentication dialog box (e.g. thrown up by a fake installer package), and after a program gets admin privileges it can do pretty much anything it wants.

    User gullibility/stupidity is extremely hard to protect against, and is for a large part independent of the underlying OS.

  1. eldarkus

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2004

    0

    re: money

    Lots of money to be made.. threating to release company info, hacking banks and transfering money, pop-ups via hacking.. I'm sure there are more.

    Not that i'm defending this crappy, re-hashed article at all. Tom is correct. there would be much more notariaty in hacking OSX than windows from a personal achievement standpoint..

  1. eldarkus

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2004

    0

    to Jonas

    "User gullibility/stupidity is extremely hard to protect against, and is for a large part independent of the underlying OS."

    But since that is the case with every single OS, then it is a moot point. It levels the playing field so all you have left is the security within the OS.

  1. Jonas Maebe

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2002

    0

    Re: to Jonas

    "But since that is the case with every single OS, then it is a moot point. It levels the playing field so all you have left is the security within the OS."

    It's not a moot point at all, it simply means that the security within the OS is simply irrelevant a lot of cases. All these people inadvertently installing spyware on their Windows machines could do it just the same on Mac OS X.

  1. nat

    Junior Member

    Joined: Mar 2002

    0

    and before..

    someone posts the "mac's don't have the market share" arguement on why they aren't attacked more often...

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/12/16/windowsstyle_security_hell_stalks_mac/

  1. eldarkus

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Feb 2004

    0

    Re: to Jonas

    youre talking user security over computer security. 2 different arguements... My point still stands. If it's irrelevant as you say, then why bother discussing OS security at all? lol

    there are differences in the way Win and OSX gives privledges to the user. But since the user security is the same across the board, you have to focus on the OS security!

  1. Jonas Maebe

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jan 2002

    0

    Re: to Jonas

    "you're talking user security over computer security. 2 different arguements..."

    I'm saying that "user security" in many cases completely overrules the whole "computer security" thing.

    "My point still stands. If it's irrelevant as you say, then why bother discussing OS security at all?"

    I never said it was irrelevant, I said it was irrelevant in a lot of case. As in "most problems with spyware and many problems with viruses on windows have nothing to do at all with OS security, and would happen in exactly the same way under Mac OS X with those same users".

    "There are differences in the way Win and OSX gives privledges to the user. But since the user security is the same across the board, you have to focus on the OS security!"

    No, because then you create an unrealistic and false sense of security.

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented