digital music/video

10/20/2005, 6:00pm, EDT

Thursday, October 20th

Microsoft backs off exclusive music deals

Microsoft has backed off its exclusive music deal agreements it had required of MP3 player manufacturers. Already under government scrutiny over its behavior toward competitors, Microsoft had told manufacturers of iPod-like portable audio devices that they were not allowed to distribute rivals' music player software, but then pulled back after one company protested, according to Associated press. "The Justice Department said the incident was 'unfortunate,' but that government lawyers decided to drop the issue because Microsoft agreed 10 days later to change the contracts. The government disclosed details of the dispute in a federal court document made available Thursday. The disputed contracts would have affected portable music players that compete with Apple Computer Inc.'s wildly popular iPod. Legal and industry experts said Microsoft's demands probably would have violated the landmark 2002 antitrust settlement between the company and the Bush administration."


Filed under: industry
Other story tags: digital music/video

, , 4comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz


4 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All   Global Settings
landmark my ass
0
10/20, 6:21pm, EDT
"Microsoft's demands probably would have violated the landmark 2002 antitrust settlement between the company and the Bush administration"

yeah, right. Convicted abusive monopolist gets off with a slap on the wrist. What a laugh.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Oct 2000
User is offline
Huh?
0
10/20, 7:12pm, EDT
Not exactly a slap on the wrist. They were forced to change the offending contracts in order to comply with the original settlement after all...
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Apr 2004
User is offline
Yup
0
10/21, 8:27am, EDT
...that's a slap on the wrist for refusal, yet again, to follow the terms of their settlement unless threatened. What did it really cost them? $500 in lawyer fees?

If they had to pay $1 billion for each time they violated their settlement, they might start obeying it. (Keep in mind that $1 billion is close to pocket change for them, but it adds up.)
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jan 2002
User is offline
Re: landmark
0
10/21, 12:05pm, EDT
Well, it was landmark. It was the first time in a long while a convicted monopolist was allowed to 'settle' by basically agreeing to a set of 'rules' that they might or might not decide to stay with.

Now in Europe, there they had some teeth. US? Nah.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2001
User is offline
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

RSS Feeds

Have the latest content delivered to your desktop via RSS. Use the links below to get access to a specific blog, news, or reviews feed.



  MacNN -all

  MacNN Reviews

  MacNN Podcasts

  iPodNN

  Electronista

  Left Lane News
Want To Sell Your Laptop? Any Condition - receive Top Cash. Get an instant quote. Free shipping www.CashForLaptops.com
Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.