digital music/video

10/04/2005, 1:45pm, EDT

Tuesday, October 4th

EMI says iTunes pricing doesn't prevent piracy

EMI Group Chairman Eric Nicoli Tuesday rebuffed Apple's assertion that a single price and/or a lower price for songs sold over the internet helps prevent piracy in the music industry. "I'm not persuaded by the argument that a single price deters piracy," Nicoli said at a news conference in response to comments from Apple's CEO Steve Jobs, who last month called music companies greedy for seeking variable prices for song downloads. "I'm not persuaded of the fact that a lower price deters piracy. What I am persuaded of is that making music more convenient and better value is a deterrent to piracy." According to the Dow Jones Newswire report, Apple's iTunes Music Store website accounts for around 82-percent of all legally downloaded music in the U.S., where Apple charges $1 per track. Variable pricing would allow record labels to levy more for the most recent hits and less for the older tracks in their back catalogues.


Filed under: industry
Other story tags: digital music/video

, , 6comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz


6 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All   Global Settings
Typical
0
10/04, 2:41pm, EDT
Of course we would hear that from an a biased music exec, whose copy control features are the worst in the industry.

How about soliciting the opinion of the actual music buying public?
Professional Poster
Joined Sep 1999
User is offline
Translation
0
10/04, 3:07pm, EDT
more for the most recent hits = $2-$3 a song

less for the older tracks in their back catalogues = $.99 a song
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Apr 2002
User is offline
Oh, I doubt that
0
10/04, 3:36pm, EDT
I'm sure he meant he wanted to sell the hits for $.99 and lower the price on the older music to $.70 or less.

Right?

:D
Junior Member
Joined Sep 2000
User is offline
...
0
10/04, 4:20pm, EDT
at least it gives people who want one or two songs from a CD a better option than stealing, er "sharing" it... the sad thing is that they (the labels) still squeeze the artist... I think they get ~$0.06 of the $0.99, and Apple only get's about $0.04... sooo.... that means $0.89 goes to the label... nice. I'm sure they are hurting for money when there is no physical production cost or material delivered for that price per song...

whatever...

:)
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Oct 2005
User is offline
No one price...
0
10/04, 5:35pm, EDT
It's not ONE price that prevents piracy, its a LOW price. $1 is about the right price. Older songs should be cheaper. New songs should not be more.

Asshole music exec.
Addicted to MacNN
Joined Oct 2001
User is offline
Is he serious?
0
10/05, 6:48am, EDT
How many people have posted that if the price goes up they will stop purchasing music from iTMS? I've used the original Napster, Audiogalaxy, and the more recent P2P services to 'sample' music. I haven't since the iTMS. In fact I've given the record companies well over $400 since April 2003. Raise the price and I won't buy any track over $.99. I'm find some other way to 'sample' the more expensive tracks.
Mac Elite
Joined Nov 2000
User is offline
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

RSS Feeds

Have the latest content delivered to your desktop via RSS. Use the links below to get access to a specific blog, news, or reviews feed.



  MacNN -all

  MacNN Reviews

  MacNN Podcasts

  iPodNN

  Electronista

  Left Lane News
Want To Sell Your Laptop? Any Condition - receive Top Cash. Get an instant quote. Free shipping www.CashForLaptops.com
Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.