troubleshooting/tutorials/security

08/28/2005, 3:55pm, EDT

Sunday, August 28th

A look into the stats behind iTunes' Party Shuffle

OmniNerd has an interesting discussion on the stastics behind iTunes' Party Shuffle feature, which allows users to play back higher-rated songs more often. The author looks at how star ratings affect playback counts: "For the rating-biased trial the preference algorithm appears to be linear from 12% to 27% for the rated songs. Moving from the 5-star rating downward, the linear preference declines around 4% with each step down in rating, but doubles over the drop from 1-star to unrated with a fall of 8%. While one star may seem like the lowest rating, no-rating proved the black sheep of the lot."


Filed under: troubleshooting

, , 7comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz


7 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All   Global Settings
WTF?
0
08/28, 6:14pm, EDT
are "stastics"? Do you mean statistics?
Addicted to MacNN
Joined Oct 2001
User is offline
fascinating
0
08/28, 7:33pm, EDT
not
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jun 2005
User is offline
OMG!!
0
08/28, 7:48pm, EDT
Now that I know all of this, I can then make my ratings accordingly so I can party shuffle and know exactly how often and when a song will play!

Or, maybe not. But with this info, I can complete work on my thesis, "What people do when they have no life, plenty of time on their hands, and lack any type of ability to go out into the world"
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Nov 2000
User is offline
geez, people.
0
08/28, 9:21pm, EDT
Actually, this is really interesting. I would have assumed a non-rated song would be equal to a 3-star, as the middle of the pack. This article effectively argues that if you want accurate playback, you should either rate every song you own, or not bother rating anything below a 3 stars. (Assuming that you think 3-stars is average)

Weird choice, apple. But at least now we know how it works.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Apr 2005
User is offline
people actually bother?
0
08/29, 11:54am, EDT
how many people actually bother to rate their songs anyway? I sure as heck have better things to do with my time.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Sep 2001
User is offline
Re: people actually bothe
0
08/29, 1:21pm, EDT
how many people actually bother to rate their songs anyway? I sure as heck have better things to do with my time. Yep, All 4000 songs in my repertoire, ranked and rated appropriately. Then again, I like to listen to songs I like on my iPod, and certain songs should just either never play or only under certain circumstances (some songs work great on an album, but just don't work as a single).
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2001
User is offline
Re: people actually bothe
0
08/29, 7:46pm, EDT
"certain songs should just either never play" - testudo

You have songs on your iPod that should never play? You are a clever fellow, sir. I would have never thought of that. I don't have an iPod, but using it as a repository for songs I never listen to... I'm guessing Apple never thought of that.
Baninated
Joined Aug 2005
User is offline
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

RSS Feeds

Have the latest content delivered to your desktop via RSS. Use the links below to get access to a specific blog, news, or reviews feed.



  MacNN -all

  MacNN Reviews

  MacNN Podcasts

  iPodNN

  Electronista

  Left Lane News
Want To Sell Your Laptop? Any Condition - receive Top Cash. Get an instant quote. Free shipping www.CashForLaptops.com
Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.