apple news/media reports
08/16/2005, 8:10am, EDT
Tuesday, August 16th
Macs safer than Windows, Internet threats growing
Macs are safer than Windows PCs for some online hazards, while online threats to computer security and privacy continue to worsen and cost American consumers more than $11 billion over the past two years. The 2005 Consumer Reports State of the Net survey of online consumers found that home users have a 1-in-3 chance of suffering computer damage, financial loss, or both because of a computer virus or spyware. However, the survey found that only 20 percent of Mac owners reported detecting a virus in the past two years, compared with 66 percent of Windows PC owners. In addition, only 8 percent of Mac users reported a spyware infection in the last six months, while 54 percent of Windows PC users reported the same. Consumer Reports offered the conclusions based on a nationally representative survey of more than 3,200 households with at-home internet access.
Filed under: Apple
,
, 16
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
Is this right? Who did they ask? Even the anti-virus software companies, who have everything to gain from shouting about Mac viruses, have nothing to announce. Or did they mean that 20% of Mac users had detected a _Windows _ virus, sent to them in an email, or by a dodgy web page, etc? If so, that should be mentioned, as it makes the story even clearer.
What does the statement say? "20 percent of Mac owners reported detecting a virus in the past two years".
OK, did it state that these owners detected Mac viruses? No. Just that they detected a virus. Most AV software for the mac is designed to not only scan for Mac viruses, but also for Windows viruses, so they aren't passed on to other window users later on (esp. in email). So these 20% mac users could easily have detected viruses, its just that most might have been windows viruses.
So, if you're going to rant, please rant on the fact that CR didn't explain this part of the information, as opposed to just saying 20% found a virus.
But don't say they're making things up. They aren't. They just aren't very good at disseminating facts. Big difference.
These could be people running OS9 - that had virii. Believe it or not there are people still using it!
Someone at CR should have spent more time interpreting their data. Surely someone there is aware that no viruses for the Mac have been detected in the wild? Or someone knows someone who is aware? This is hardly obscure information - it's fairly well publicised. Given this (actual) fact, they should have recognized a problem and investigated.
CR carries an awful lot of credibility, and should be held to a higher standard than the typical tech journalist. Unfortunately, errors along these lines have diminished CR's reputation in my opinion - I rarely take their reports as the highest authority any more.
This is definitely a case of poor self-reporting and Mac user ignorance about what a virus is. It's no wonder they don't know what one is, since they have never seen one.
Sure I'd like to think Mac users are all smart, etc., but the facts are that computer users in general are dolts, just like people in general. After all, people think that by collecting coke pull tabs, they can pay for someone's kidney treatments. Dolts I tell you!
As for the 8% with spyware, they're probably using internet explorer and think that all the popups they ar getting means they have spyware.
CR should have included a sidebar, though, saying how there are no current Mac viruses other than those coming from Microsoft software (Word/Excel/VirtualPC).