A different take on the Mircosoft, Apple Patent issue
updated 03:45 pm EDT, Fri August 12, 2005
Microsoft, Apple Patent
A patent filed by Microsoft's John Platt, an expert in machine learning, which "relates generally to systems and methodologies that facilitate generation of playlists," has been the cause of much speculation this week because Apple's patent for a rotational user input was . "In truth, the patents in question might not even be directly related."










could it be proven
08/12, 04:01pm reply
Could it be proven and actually enforced that Microsoft may be abusing the use of patents to try to s**** it's competitors either now and in the possible future... ie.. iPod, and think 3 years ago.
who knows...
zioncity
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jun 2005
Cross Licensing ?
08/12, 04:09pm reply
Doesn't Apple and Microsoft have a patent cross licensing deal ?. I thought that was one of the agreements of the 1997 settlement. ?
AledDavies
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jul 2002
He worked at Synaptic
08/12, 04:17pm reply
That company makes the scroll wheels IIRC. He file the patent a year "after" the first iPod came out.
aristotles
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2004
97 settlement is over
08/12, 04:19pm reply
all those rights expired before Office X was shipped.. Office X was the first product to prive MS would not abandon Apple after the settlement was expired. Given the limited data, I don't think that Apple's product is in any jeopardy.. but I do think it'll be interesting to see what does come up. With if the rotary interface is a dial pad for some unknown product??
ibugv4
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jun 2003
Heh
08/12, 04:26pm reply
Mircosoft eh?
jchen
Junior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
re: Cross Licensing
08/12, 06:35pm reply
Of course the agreement was secret, but I have heard the cross licensing of '97 was related only to the many things MS ripped off from QuickTime. MS' agreement to continue Mac development for that year was also thrown in along with some millions to settle up.
brainiac_7
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jun 2005
Prior Art
08/12, 11:19pm reply
Subject says it all. The patent was supposed to be filed more than a year after Apple were shipping a product that is supposed to infringe on the patent. This makes the patent invalid. But if it's to do with playlists only, I can't see what that patent has to do with anything click wheel related because the click wheel has as much to do with playlist generation as my mouse does.
And remember not even iTunes was the first to come up with playlists. It is a concept far, far older than even computers. Just ask any retired DJ. Just because it wasn't in a computer, doesn't mean it wasn't a playlist. Paper and pen is a system and methodology to facilitate generation of playlists. I wonder if Microsoft will take on all the paper, pen, pencil and crayon manufacturers of the world. I think the Ancient Egyptians and probably many more before them could claim prior art on MS's patent.
beeble
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Mar 2004
Relax...
08/13, 01:46am reply
These "reports" are guesstimating that the rejection has to do with the MS playlist patent application, but I don't think that's the case at all.
I would wager that the issue has more to do with dials in general. Dials and k**** have been around forever, and k**** that select digital menu items have been present for decades. Heck, I have an old stereo receiver from the late 80s that uses a k***/dial to select radio stations and volume/balance/eq settings.. complete with visual display.
That, in my opinion, would hinder the patent application for the iPod wheel interface much more that an automatic playlist generation patent.
spacefreak
Addicted to MacNN
Joined: Feb 2002
From what I've read ...
08/15, 07:57am reply
The patent is about the software menu, not the click wheel. But the iPod menu is based on Mac OS X's column view.
JackNN
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jan 2005
Oh, and ...
08/15, 07:58am reply
The click wheel was invented by an Apple exec and built by Synaptics.
JackNN
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jan 2005