Mossberg: Microsoft outclasses Apple's Mighty Mouse
updated 09:50 am EDT, Tue August 9, 2005
MS beats Apple design
Technology guru Walt Mossberg says that Apple's , Mossberg says that the Mighty Mouse faces clashing design ideals that make it harder to use than competing products: "But in a stubborn homage to the old dogma, Apple designed the Mighty Mouse so it looks like, and can work like, a one-button mouse.... Microsoft's new model is cordless, like most modern, premium mice. Apple's Mighty Mouse is tethered to the computer with a cord, like most low-end models." The review criticizes Apple's implementation of the dual-click system using a single-button mouse: "I found that the design makes right-clicking slower and clumsier than on a typical Microsoft or Logitech mouse with real buttons.... I found that right-clicking with the Mighty Mouse was unpredictable. Sometimes it worked, sometimes it didn't. We needed to press the right side repeatedly to get a single right click, slowing us down and annoying us, well, mightily."



Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Apr 2001
Wireless is premium?
Wireless does not make a mouse premium. Why is the industry going to all wireless, why do I need a battery for my mouse? Why do I need my mouse to be wireless? I'm not going to take my mouse across the room to control my computer. Why add the hassle of a battery and added costs to mice? This does not now or ever will make any sense to me. Of course I do agree that the Microsoft wired Intellimouse is the best mouse I've ever used. I've not used the new Apple mouse yet however.