ipod

08/09/2005, 3:00pm, EDT

Tuesday, August 9th

Apple fails to patent iPod interface

Apple has failed to patent its iPod software interface, following three-year-long patent application process, which could allow its competitor to build similar-style GUIs for their own MP3 players. AppleInsider reports that the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued a final rejection for Apple's patent application, which lists Apple vice president Jeff Robbin and Apple chief executive Steve Jobs as two of its primary inventors. "Standing in Apple's way appears to be a prior filing by inventor John Platt, who submitted a patent application for a similar software design for a portable device in May of 2002 -- just five months before Robbin submitted his claims on behalf of Apple."


Filed under: iPod

, , 9comments, del.icio.us, slashdot, digg, buzz


9 comments
Reader Reactions (Please use <i></i> for italic text)

subscribe to comments
for this article




Expand All   Global Settings
ummm...
0
08/09, 3:31pm, EDT
whoops.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Jul 2004
User is offline
08/09, 4:13pm, EDT
Without interface-protection the iPod could be f*cked.
Posting Junkie
Joined May 2001
User is offline
Microsoft's John Platt??
0
08/09, 4:24pm, EDT
I suspect the John Platt that owns the patent is . Which could mean Apple is now violating a Microsoft patent. Serious oops!
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2005
User is offline
Microsoft's John Platt U
0
08/09, 4:34pm, EDT
Looks like the site strips URLs in brackets. Here's the link to Microsoft's John Platt:

http://research.microsoft.com/%7Ejplatt/
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2005
User is offline
i would say
0
08/09, 4:37pm, EDT
industrial espionage at work
Baninated
Joined Mar 2001
User is offline
i don't get it
0
08/09, 5:18pm, EDT
The iPod was for sale well before May 2002, what's the deal?
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Aug 2001
User is offline
there is no spoon
0
08/09, 6:22pm, EDT
note that a "final rejection" is in no way final, it just changes which form you use to keep the application alive. Apple can continue the application process (i.e. arguing with the PTO examiner) or appeal to the PTO board of appeals. Then there are appeals to the federal courts.
Forum Regular
Joined Oct 2000
User is offline
No surprise.
0
08/09, 7:44pm, EDT
John Platt used to work for Synaptics. Although I'm wondering if Synaptics has a say in this, or perhaps a counter patent application (if such a thing exists)?
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Feb 2003
User is offline
Misleading Article Title
0
08/09, 8:37pm, EDT
The article title leads you to believe that Apple sat there and did nothing. Where's the editor???

Anyway, even if the patent is eventually denied, I don't predict any doom & gloom.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined Feb 2003
User is offline
Your Comments

In order to post comments: If you are a registered member, please login with your MacNN Forums username and password otherwise please uncheck the checkbox below.


Registered Member?
macnn forums login:

macnn forums password:

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

RSS Feeds

Have the latest content delivered to your desktop via RSS. Use the links below to get access to a specific blog, news, or reviews feed.



  MacNN -all

  MacNN Reviews

  MacNN Podcasts

  iPodNN

  Electronista

  Left Lane News
Want To Sell Your Laptop? Any Condition - receive Top Cash. Get an instant quote. Free shipping www.CashForLaptops.com
Buy from The Apple Store, iTunes.com, Amazon.com, TechDepot, OfficeDepot, Computers4Sure, or donate.