Text Size

Apple fails to patent iPod interface

updated 03:00 pm EDT, Tue August 9, 2005

iPod UI patent rejected

Apple has failed to , following three-year-long patent application process, which could allow its competitor to build similar-style GUIs for their own MP3 players. AppleInsider reports that the United States Patent and Trademark Office issued a final rejection for Apple's patent application, which lists Apple vice president Jeff Robbin and Apple chief executive Steve Jobs as two of its primary inventors. "Standing in Apple's way appears to be a prior filing by inventor John Platt, who submitted a patent application for a similar software design for a portable device in May of 2002 -- just five months before Robbin submitted his claims on behalf of Apple."

 
Previous Comments

ummm...

08/09, 03:31pm reply

whoops.

bobthenob

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jul 2004

0

s***

08/09, 04:13pm reply

Without interface-protection the iPod could be f*cked.

- - e r i k - -

Posting Junkie

Joined: May 2001

0

Microsoft's John Platt??

08/09, 04:24pm reply

I suspect the John Platt that owns the patent is . Which could mean Apple is now violating a Microsoft patent. Serious oops!

mitchcohen

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2005

0

Microsoft's John Platt U

08/09, 04:34pm reply

Looks like the site strips URLs in brackets. Here's the link to Microsoft's John Platt:

http://research.microsoft.com/%7Ejplatt/

mitchcohen

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2005

0

i would say

08/09, 04:37pm reply

industrial espionage at work

porieux

Baninated

Joined: Mar 2001

0

i don't get it

08/09, 05:18pm reply

The iPod was for sale well before May 2002, what's the deal?

Peter Bonte

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2001

0

there is no spoon

08/09, 06:22pm reply

note that a "final rejection" is in no way final, it just changes which form you use to keep the application alive. Apple can continue the application process (i.e. arguing with the PTO examiner) or appeal to the PTO board of appeals. Then there are appeals to the federal courts.

mishakim

Forum Regular

Joined: Oct 2000

0

No surprise.

08/09, 07:44pm reply

John Platt used to work for Synaptics. Although I'm wondering if Synaptics has a say in this, or perhaps a counter patent application (if such a thing exists)?

JohnnyFive

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Feb 2003

0

Misleading Article Title

08/09, 08:37pm reply

The article title leads you to believe that Apple sat there and did nothing. Where's the editor???

Anyway, even if the patent is eventually denied, I don't predict any doom & gloom.

zzimbob

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Feb 2003

0

Popular News