toggle

AAPL Stock: 112.94 ( + 1.16 )

toggle

Comments

  1. Ighal

    Joined:

    0

    First post? well...

    C'mon guys, it is OBVIOUS that Windows will be able to run on Intel-Macs and OS X on regular PC's. I can bet a lot of money right now that at least 6 month after the IntelMac release both things are going to be possible with or without software or hardware help. (a dongle, a dongle dumper or a hack or a crack).

  1. bobolicious

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    this trojan horse...

    ...may lure pc users to the light side...

  1. ronjamin

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    What About Disk Format?

    Some may not know that Win2000 & XP generally like to run using a Windows format called NTFS formatting and sometimes an older format called FAT-32.

    What are the implications of running WinXP on a Mac then?

    I would expect that Win would run in a disk partition, or on a disk image formatted for NTFS.

  1. Kazrog

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    WINE

    All they need to do is port WINE to OS X and we can run Windows apps inside OS X at full speed. It's going to rock!!!

  1. Voch

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    Well...

    I'm looking forward to the possibility of a, say, Virtual PC 8.0, running on an Intel-based Mac. I just hope it doesn't kill the Mac gaming industry ("why make an Intel Mac game when they can just run Windows?").

  1. resuna

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    OS X supports FAT32

    You can already read and write a shared FAT32 drive from OSX.

  1. climacs

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    the end of X vs. Win?

    so would this spell the end of OS X vs. Windows? replaced by OS X, or Windows, or both?

    one could have both on the same machine, you don't need to swap out hardware and get mac versions of your favorite applications and games

    that would inevitably help Apple at Microsoft's expense...

  1. Cf

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    just curious

    nobody has mentioned anything about the possibility of increased viruses/spyware on the mac thanks to this venture in any of the articles or responses i have read so far.

  1. resuna

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    Which possibility?

    "nobody has mentioned anything about the possibility of increased viruses/spyware on the mac thanks to this venture in any of the articles or responses i have read so far."

    If you are running Windows, you are susceptible to weaknesses in Windows that increase your exposure to infection. The fact that you're also running Mac OS X doesn't reduce this risk.

  1. Rainy Day

    Joined: Dec 1969

    0

    DarWINE; no Malware

    No malware for MacOS X; only Windoze. It's not the processor (nor marketshare), but the poor engineering work of M$ which is responsible for malware vulnerabilities. Windoze app's running under Virtual PC on a Mac are vulnerable too. But MacOS X Intel apps will be as robust as they are now on a PPC.

    Regarding WINE, there's already the DarWINE project:

    http://darwine.opendarwin.org/

    Their home page has this to say about the MacIntel: "It means that Wine will be able to work on Mac OS X/x86 as well [as] it does on linux, with a limited effort. You might notice that there is already some code to support Mac OS X/x86 in the Wine's source code, but it is untested."

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

Dell AD211 Bluetooth speaker

For all of the high-priced, over-engineered Bluetooth speakers in the electronics market, there is still room for mass-market solution ...

VisionTek 128GB USB Pocket SSD

USB flash drives dealt the death blow to both the floppy and Zip drives. While still faster than either of the old removable media, sp ...

Kodak PixPro SL10 Smart Lens Camera

Smartphone imagery still widely varies. Large Megapixel counts don't make for a good image, and the optics in some devices are lackin ...

toggle

Most Commented