Text Size

Report: Apple to ditch IBM, move to Intel-based Macs

updated 10:30 pm EDT, Fri June 3, 2005

Intel CPUs inside Macs

Apple next week will announce a around Intel processors. UPDATE: A new Wall Street Journal article confirms the transition plan outlined in CNET's report. "An industry executive familiar with the matter, contacted Saturday, verified that schedule."

Over the past several years, IBM has been criticized for its inability to deliver high-volumes of faster processors. However, recent partnerships with game console manufacturers such as Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo were thought to have given the IBM the resources and funding necessary to deliver faster, more powerful processors in a more timely fashion. IBM has continuing concerns with Apple's desire for a wide variety of PowerPC processors and about the profitability of a low-volume business, according to the CNET report.

Initial reports were rejected by some analysts, despite the ease of portability of Mac OS X to the x86 chip architecture. Some saw the reports of Apple-Intel discussions as Apple's attempt to pressure IBM into delivering more volume of its high-speed processors, which it has had trouble doing for several years. Meanwhile, other reports suggested that talks maybe related to Apple's use of WiMAX, a next-generation home wireless technology.

In recent months, Apple has seen support from Intel, who has filed briefs to support Apple subpoenas for confidential information from Mac websites. Additionally, Intel CEO Paul Otellini recently bolstered Apple's switch campaign by suggesting that users move to the Mac for increased security. Apple and Intel are also among five companies companies fighting a US wireless patent.

 
Previous Comments

Hmmm

06/03, 10:38pm reply

I would rather have them work with AMD...

garyj

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Mar 1999

0

and our source for this..

06/03, 10:44pm reply

I might believe this but couldn't someone be a little more specific than "sources familiar with the situation"

Eccent

Junior Member

Joined: Dec 1999

0

What if?

06/03, 10:49pm reply

What if this is true? We'll see Monday. I wonder if OS X is really ready to run on an Intel processor. This is a mix of anxiety and excitment for me. This will be a long weekend, for sure.

chris409

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: May 2005

0

Yeah, right

06/03, 10:50pm reply

Not going to happen. I'll beleive it when I see it. Or rather, hear it at the WWDC keynote. Apple is going to end their partnership with IBM in hopes that Intel can get them to the magical 3 GHz with a CISC chip, no less? I don't think so. Will Apple use Intel for WiMAX chips? Maybe. Not going to happen for CPUs.

spiggott

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jul 2000

0

I think not

06/03, 11:05pm reply

It just makes no sense. Why switch from a competitve CPU family with a bright future (huge R&D budgets from IBM, Sony and MS) to the slowest of the x86 CPU families which gets spanked by both AMD and the PowerPC CPUs.

WiMAX I can believe. PCI-E chipsets I can believe. CPUs for a new device (tablet. iPod, etc) I can believe. But x86 CPUs in Macs? I'll believe that when I see it. If they do this, then when my Dual 2.5 is due for an upgrade, I won't be buying Apple.

mattfromnz

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jun 2005

0

When will people realize

06/03, 11:13pm reply

The Wall Street Journal is NOT a tech journal, they should leave that to the people that know what they are talking about. This report has been made forever. If they do switch to Intel it will only be the Intel will be making their chips to Apple's Specs and no one can expect to run OS X on any current Intel Hardware because the Chips they will make for Apple will be different than the ones they make for other makers.

What really stinks is that when Steve does NOT announce they are going to Intel to make chips Apple's Stock will tank based on rumors from unfounded sources.

Roehlstation

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2001

0

Wow

06/03, 11:20pm reply

That would be something. Yep, Monday. Of course Apple could just be dropping a rumor to bring attention to the WWDC keynote. Talk about mixing things up.

slider

Mac Elite

Joined: Oct 1999

0

Windows compatibility

06/03, 11:25pm reply

If this is true, it would allow Apple to overcome one of their greatest obstacles: Windows compatibility. You would no longer need x86 "emulation" to run Windows applications... a simple Windows compatibility layer (think wine) would run Windows apps at full speed.

The downside of this is that it might discourage developers from making OS X native applications. Why do it when they can run nearly as well in a capability layer?

JustinHoMi

Forum Regular

Joined: Oct 2000

0

Maybe

06/03, 11:47pm reply

Maybe it's IBM telling Apple that it's over.... Since they have all their console chip sale sewn up they don't really need to sell to Apple. And they are letting Apple go to Intel so it won't hurt Apple.

How would it look if IBM just dropped Apple, it would hurt Apple's credibility. So maybe it's a mutual decision.

I.P. Freely

Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: May 2003

0

x86?

06/03, 11:49pm reply

Maybe I'm missing something, but where did the article specifically say Apple would be using x86 processors? It just says they will be using Intel chips. Presumably Intel is capable of making a wide variety of chips (who knows, perhaps they could even make PowerPC chips).

Elektrix

Dedicated MacNNer

Joined: Sep 2001

0

Popular News