05/13/2005, 12:45pm, EDT
Friday, May 13th
Apple's future: Mac sales growth, subscription model?
Merrill analyst Steven Milunovich said that smaller competitors such as Real Networks and Napster may see more of a direct negative impact by the launch of Yahoo's service. The firm believes that Yahoo's entry into the increasingly crowded digital music space may push Apple to offer its own subscription service later this year, but that Yahoo's service may have its own drawbacks, including Yahoo's use of advertising, the lack of interest in current WMA-supported music players, and a possible backlash when its introductory pricing ends.
"Apple could flick the switch on a subscription model. Yahoo clearly is a problem for Real Networks and Napster, but will it hurt Apple? We do think Yahoo's entry could cause Apple to offer iTunes as a subscription model later this year, especially if there is evidence of share loss. Subscriptions are about 15% of the legal download market with iTunes over 70%," according to the research note.
The research firm also said that Apple's management is seing more evidence of the halo effect, although it did not provide any further details. Merrill "conservatively" estimates that the effect could drive "sustainable growth rate" of Mac revenue by 15-20 percent, based on its model.
Merrill said that a influx of perceived negative news impacting Apple was mounting--citing Bill Gates' recent declaration that mobile phones will replace the iPod as customers' preferred listening device (in addition to the recent Yahoo launch). While news has been affecting
Apple is working to protect iPod profits, according to the firm: "Although we think the iPod franchise is safe for at least the next year, the driver of the stock increasingly will be Mac sales." Merrill reiterated its "Buy" rating with a price target of $51 per share.
Filed under: Investor
,
, 15
,
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
I only buy on average 1-2 songs per money. So 5 bucks would be expensive.
As I said many times before, subcription is not meant to replace the single song model.
If you only listen to the songs you ALREADY have and no more, then obvious subscription is not right for you. If you want to listen to many new songs you do not have AND want to burn song, then Yahoo! Music Engine may be right for you.
.Mac!
It has had it's ups and downs, but it's conceivable that they could offer .Mac subs access to music (or video) on demand. It all several sets of WebObjects apps. They wouldn't even need to commit to the idea full bore like the other guys, and users can maintain all the benefits they have now. just another addition to the table.
Imagine: Incredibles... now showing in .Mac....
Carlos
D you "rent" CDs? If you are really so hard up on having access to a larger collection of music, try your local library. It's "free".
My question is that I think you know these answers as well. So are you just arguing for arguing's sake? Or do you just like to use "quotes"?
For your information, I listen to classical music. And I do go to my local library to access its large of classical records. I occasionally listen to hip-hop, pop, r&b, rock, etc and do not own many of those CDs therefore, radio and subscription works for me. Satisfied?
The subscription model is doing diddly-squat. Why would Apple move in that direction?