troubleshooting/tutorials/security
03/31/2005, 4:30pm, EST
Thursday, March 31st
Gartner warns about Mac OS X spyware potential
Gartner has become latest firm to warn about vulnerabilities in Mac OS X, warning users that a single exploit could cause problems for businesses. CNET News.com says that the research firm warned businesses reliant on the Mac to guard against "spyware infestations--only days after Symantec caused an uproar by warning that Mac OS X was becoming a target for hackers and viruses. Citing the possibility of a hybrid worm that could affect both Mac/PCs, the firm said that a single vulnerability may go unnoticed and could cause problems for the relatively small user base: "The Macintosh installed base is relatively small, with only about 3 percent of systems in use today running the Mac OS,' Reynolds wrote in a research note. 'The Mac OS is also a harder target...However, it only takes one exploited weakness to cause trouble," he added.
Filed under: troubleshooting
,
, 29
,
,
,
,
,

subscribe to comments
for this article
These people make my point for me, even one exploit can cause trouble. Sure, and multiply that by 1000 and you get Windows.
It is better to be prepared for these type of things rather than just hope they don't happen.
He was also concerned that spyware targeting the Mac OS could establish itself before its existence was widely documented.
Gee, just like Windows or any other OS. Until the existence of spyware is known, of course it could be problematic and hard to find. And how vigilant should we be. Is this like the "Look out for suspicious activity and report it to the FBI" that people were told to do after 9/11? Should we all be running packet-sniffers and memory scanners looking for anything that might not supposed to be there?
The comment about a 'bybrid' worm is great, esp. if you read the article, where it actually says
A hybrid worm targeting both the Mac OS and Microsoft Windows could be developed, but such an attack would be difficult to orchestrate," Reynolds said.
Difficult to say the least. If its hybrid, it would have to be coded to target two completely different OS's AND platforms. That will only occur when "Virus/Worm Script Kit v3.0 (now with cross-platform support)" gets released so the script-kiddies can start sending them out. But at least they tell us up front that it COULD be possible. It also could be possible that I'll go home tonight and find an attractive woman making me dinner. But I don't think either is likely.
Oh, and saying "One exploit could cause trouble" is so obvious, its stupid. Do these people believe people think that we're all out here going "Gee, one or two holes? Who cares. You need at least a dozen to have a problem!"
Man, you know, I could work for Gartner (OK, I can't, I'd have quit by now for having to come out with statements that had a "duh!" factor of 10). But if it gets me that woman making me dinner....
The math here astounds me. It talks about how small the user base is (3%) and that it would be harder to cause problems on a Mac, but it's still possible. That has to mean that with a huge 97% userbase, and really easy exploits, things are far worse. But, that's not news 'cause everyone knows that.
It's like - if someone steals the radio from a convertable with the top down, that's not as big of a deal if someone breaks into a safety deposit box and steals the same radio, I guess ;-)
Businesses who choose to run macs will stay on top of problems the same way they would any platform. It's not going to go hiddin for weeks because only 2% of the world is using it!