toggle

AAPL Stock: 493.42 ( + 0.25 )

MacNN News

Hackers re-enable PyMusique access to iTMS

updated 08:15 am EST, Wed March 23, 2005

PyMusique access to iTMS

The trio of developers who created PyMusique have found yet another way for their software application to purchase copy-protection free songs from the iTunes Music Store (iTMS), following Apple and released a new version of PyMusique (for Linux only) that allows users to once again browse the iTMS and purchase DRM-free music.

by MacNN Staff

(44)

TAGS :

industry, digital music/video

Share the Article

Facebook Twitter Delious Slash Dot Digg

toggle

Comments

bobolicious
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2002

0

03/23, 08:23am | report spam | close Reply |
AAC quality is so...

...disappointing to me I don't know why so many are buying online music in the first place - I last about 4-5 songs & then start longing for my CD player anyway...

PBG4 User
Senior User

Joined: Feb 2001

0

03/23, 08:47am | report spam | close Reply |
... and so it begins

The DRM wars have begun.

pastusza
Mac Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 1999

0

03/23, 09:01am | report spam | close Reply |
You still have to BUY

You still have to BUY the music. It's not like you're stealing it.

iTunes 4.8 should be out any day now....

Andy

kikkoman
Senior User

Joined: Nov 2002

0

03/23, 09:02am | report spam | close Reply |
AAC quality

I consider myself an "audiophie" but I do purchase music from iTunes mainly because of the convenience.

ibugv4
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jun 2003

0

03/23, 09:03am | report spam | close Reply |
hmm

bobolicious is amoung the less than 5% of the general world-wide music listening population that can distinguish the difference in AAC/MP3/AIFF compressions. It sucks to be you, man, cause CDs won't be around in another 6 years ... welcome to the future.

Chris Hutcheson
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Oct 2000

0

03/23, 09:07am | report spam | close Reply |
hmm

...and can you quote a source to validate your 5% figure?

cyngus
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Apr 1999

0

03/23, 09:22am | report spam | close Reply |
Re; hmm

While the figure may not be exactly 5%, it is very small, and may even be less than 5%. The simple fact is that MP3 compression results in minimal to zero quality loss for most types of music. Music employing very high or very low tones suffers the most and music with many instruments involved simultaneously (ie. a symphony) also suffer. AAC is better at preserving quality and I have never, once been able to tell the difference between a CD and a 128Kbps AAC. It should be notes that "true" audiophiles are dismayed with CD quality, and may pushed for a higher bit rate when the CD standard was approved.

tontondavid10
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Mar 2004

0

03/23, 09:23am | report spam | close Reply |
It's not the music...

It's the hi fidelity I care about... What exactly is the problem with AAC? Is there a hiss, a buzz, the sound of farting in the background????

jimothy
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Sep 2000

0

03/23, 09:29am | report spam | close Reply |
5% figure

Did you know that 67% of statistics are made up?

ecrelin
Junior Member

Joined: Oct 2000

0

03/23, 09:29am | report spam | close Reply |
Buy Schmy�

its stealing.
I'm no fan of DRM but why is it there? Because you have Aholes like these guys who don't like what is offered so they think they have the right to take it the way they want it. I don't like the greed culture of big business and I have some pirated software but not that I use regularly or for business. I buy that because if you don't the whole system goes to h***. If thievery wasn't so rampant no one would really care but since people champion clowns like these, geeez look we have things like DRM. For all of you who have LimeWire, Kazaa or the old Napster, how many legitimate files do or did you share and with whom? My bet is 99.9% was pirated music, movies or software. I know, you really really want it but you just can't afford it, no one will notice if you just grab it behind their back, hmmmm wonder where the greed in the business world comes from? These guys should be arrested and treated like any common thief.

denim
Mac Elite

Joined: Jun 2000

0

03/23, 09:32am | report spam | close Reply |
Laugh

As I said a few days ago, "NEXT!"

scott brown
Forum Regular

Joined: Feb 2001

0

03/23, 10:03am | report spam | close Reply |
Re: Hmm

>>While the figure may not be exactly 5%, it is very small, and may even be less than 5%. The simple fact is that MP3 compression results in minimal to zero quality loss for most types of music. Music employing very high or very low tones suffers the most and music with many instruments involved simultaneously (ie. a symphony) also suffer. AAC is better at preserving quality and I have never, once been able to tell the difference between a CD and a 128Kbps AAC. It should be notes that "true" audiophiles are dismayed with CD quality, and may pushed for a higher bit rate when the CD standard was approved.

one09jason
Forum Regular

Joined: Apr 2001

0

03/23, 10:09am | report spam | close Reply |
It's not stealing...

Ugh, for the last time, it's not theft, it's copyright infringement. Big difference.

scott brown
Forum Regular

Joined: Feb 2001

0

03/23, 10:11am | report spam | close Reply |
well that didn't work

bad post before...i'll finish now

original poster said:"While the figure may not be exactly 5%, it is very small, and may even be less than 5%. The simple fact is that MP3 compression results in minimal to zero quality loss for most types of music."

The simple fact is that this particular person can't hear a difference. The quality loss is by no means "minimal to zero." It can be very obvious if you know what to listen for

Ganesha
Senior User

Joined: Jul 2002

0

03/23, 10:21am | report spam | close Reply |
Gives Records Companies

The perfect excuse to say... Clearly this model has holes. We're going to licenses to 'Secure Audio Path' only type devices. This allows them to break the Apple iTMS majority market share they fear and forces us onto even more restrictive DRM models.

apple4ever
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jan 2001

0

03/23, 10:28am | report spam | close Reply |
Excellent

Keep up the good work guys. I don't mind paying for music, but I do mind not being able to play the music where I want(like my CD player in my car which supports standard AAC, but not FairPlay AAC).

spacefreak
Addicted to MacNN

Joined: Feb 2002

0

03/23, 10:31am | report spam | close Reply |
Re: didn't work

[i]"It can be very obvious if you know what to listen for"[/i]

The novice can start by listening to cymbals. As for everyone else, I pity those who cannot tell the difference btween a 128-AAC file and CD-quality.

My bet is that most of these people don't know what full audio sounds like because they have crappy audio systems or underdeveloped sonic listening skills. It's a shame, too, because some of the most talented people in music are engineers and producers who have spent their lives learning and perfecting the capture and reproduction of sound.

hayesk
Professional Poster

Joined: Sep 1999

0

03/23, 10:43am | report spam | close Reply |
Audio quality

"The novice can start by listening to cymbals. As for everyone else, I pity those who cannot tell the difference btween a 128-AAC file and CD-quality."

I agree. However, if I'm riding a bus or driving in the car, I can't hear the difference because of so much else going on.

I think both CD and online compressed formats have their place. If people can't hear the difference, then, yes, they are missing out on a lot, but I don't care - they're happy with what they have and I'm happy to have what I have.

ElRay
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Dec 2003

0

03/23, 10:45am | report spam | close Reply |
It's not theft ...

They're not stealing music from ITMS, it has to be bought first. All that's happening is that their client isn't adding the DRM that iTunes adds after the purchased music is downloaded.

Clive
Mac Enthusiast

Joined: Jan 2001

0

03/23, 11:09am | report spam | close Reply |
Broken

This system is going to be crackable for as long as Apple has the DRM wrapper happening on the client side. Fact.

Compression: AAC is supposed to be lossless, ie you can get a bit for bit match with the original it was taken from. MP3 certainly isn't lossless, and anyone who says they can't hear the difference must be listening through a really crappy set of headphones.

ecrelin
Junior Member

Joined: Oct 2000

0

03/23, 11:13am | report spam | close Reply |
uh uh ElRay

OK I buy a bunch of hanes tee shirts and want to sell them with my logo embroidered on. I take payment at the door and you bring your shirt to the back and wait to get the shirt embroidered and then you can leave. You come through the front door of my store, pay the price, get an unembroidered shirt and sneak out the side door you just ripped me off. The money has nothing to do with it. If you want the music without the DRM go to a music store that doesn't put it on. That's Apple's product, if you break their system and buy something they are not selling you are stealing.

ZinkDifferent
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jan 2005

0

03/23, 11:14am | report spam | close Reply |
I'll just keep saying it

Seeing as how fervent DVD Jon is in breaking Apple DRM, yet never even dares touch Windows DRM, it does make you wonder, doesn't it, where his loyalties lie -- or rather, who signs his paychecks, eh?

I guess he won't be giving up until Apple has to stop selling music, and all that's left is the draconian Windows DRM -- I have a feeling that if that were to happen, we'll stop hearing how he's just doing it to allow Linux to use the iTMS....

It all comes down to that - there's already a perfectly agreeable way to buy music that has no RM -- it's called 'used CDs'. They cost less than albums on the iTMS, the purchase screws over the RIAA (as they get no dime of the sale), and you can rip these, and move them to your iPod, with any level of quality you want. Hey, you can even move them to oher MP3 players....

Of course, this requires the use of something that neither DVD Jon, nor any of the other anti-DRM purists have -- a brain!

jpellino
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Oct 1999

0

03/23, 11:20am | report spam | close Reply |
apple4ever:

you don't need these guys - that's a red herring - you can burn to cd, rip, burn as mp3 - all perfectly acceptable to apple, no violation of anything.

firefly007
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jul 2003

0

03/23, 11:55am | report spam | close Reply |
Challenge

I have a challenge to DVD Jon - or any other cracker wannabe - why instead of breaking the DRM you honor it. If you have managed to create an iTunes clone and can connect browse purchase and download music from iTMS - forgetting to write the DRM - then I think you are good enough to write a program that can honor said DRM. Make your program dl the song and wrap the DRM and authorize that computer to play the song or be burned to CD. That would be the 'fair' thing to do. Then everyone will be happy, the RIAA will have their precious DRM (cause truly Apple would rather not have to deal with it - but never the less) and you can play your music on your Linux box - and Apple can get to work on other things. Apple would still be pissed but then that is what reverse engineering is truly about - to understand how something works so you can build it somewhere else - without breaking it. You are good at the first part of reverse engineering but seem to be lacking the re-engineering part - where you put it *ALL* back together.

"It's too hard" you say to crack the DRM to allow the song to be played? The CSS on DVDs was suppose to be hard to crack, the password on zip files where suppose to be hard to crack, heck a safe is suppose to be hard to crack - but it can be done.

You can argue the merits of DRM till the cows come home but it is here to stay - the way I look at it is, when I buy Photoshop or Final Cut Pro I have to enter my serial number to show I paid for it - DRM is just a serial number for music.

[/end rant]

scott brown
Forum Regular

Joined: Feb 2001

0

03/23, 12:14pm | report spam | close Reply |
nooooooo

[quote]Compression: AAC is supposed to be lossless, ie you can get a bit for bit match with the original it was taken from. MP3 certainly isn't lossless, and anyone who says they can't hear the difference must be listening through a really crappy set of headphones.[/quote]

No. AAC is *NOT* lossless. AAC is lossy just like MP3 is. It just might sound better than mp3. But BOTH are lossy

cooner
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Sep 2003

0

03/23, 12:26pm | report spam | close Reply |
Audiophiles ...

Yes, yes, MP3 and AAC causes compression artifacts, you can hear the difference on a decent stereo system, you personally can pick out the sound of a butterfly nibbling a cheese souffle during a thunderstorm.

You keep forgetting something: A lot of people don't care, and that's the market online music like iTMS is after. A lot of people can't afford a high-end audio system, or primarily listen to their music on their computer or on their iPod or in their car. The majority of teenagers downloading the latest Britney Spears single probably aren't all that concerned about fidelity and lossless compression.

iTMS is mostly about selling convenience. You can browse music at home, listen to samples, buy individual tracks, download the music immediately. If it took 3 hours or more to download an uncompressed audio file, a lot of their target audience wouldn't bother.

If you're a listener who isn't willing to compromise sound quality for convenience, or if your principles are wounded by the thought of DRM, then you're not iTMS's target audience and should stick to CDs or vinyl. In the meantime, though, people like 'DVD Jon' are going to ruin the system for everyone else.

Toyin
Mac Elite

Joined: Nov 2000

0

03/23, 12:29pm | report spam | close Reply |
How about this?

Quote 1: " My bet is that most of these people don't know what full audio sounds like because they have crappy audio systems or underdeveloped sonic listening skills."

Huh...maybe I don't CARE about the difference in quality. I love music and am a 'hobbiest' musician, I've got great headphones (that are too bulky to use) and a decent stereo. Yet 99.9% of the time I listen to music is while working out, in the car, or in the background while I work. I don't have time to sit around doing nothing but listen to music as I guess a fair majority of people don't.

I can't stand the arrogance, claiming something is wrong with buying or listening to AAC or MP3 music. It's convenient and it's good enough. If that's not the case for you then don't use the iTMS, but don't belittle those who do.

Toyin
Mac Elite

Joined: Nov 2000

0

03/23, 12:30pm | report spam | close Reply |
Back on topic

I hope these guys fry for this. They are ruining it for the rest of us. It's a small minority of people who asked to be liberated from the ITMS.

Sinemacula
Forum Regular

Joined: Sep 2000

0

03/23, 12:38pm | report spam | close Reply |
Zink said it...

Yup, my thought exactly when I first heard about these guys... so, assuming these guys *are* being backed by someone, who's more likely?
MS?
Napster?
Record companies? (get around Apple's DRM consistently and they have an arguement to get even tougher in their attempts to "secure" their product)
Who knows... but continued successful workarounds for Apple's DRM is about more than giving consumers "freedom" -- ultimately the effect could be *less* freedom as Apple, record companies, etc. react to this. Not cool.

mjtomlin
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Oct 1999

0

03/23, 12:53pm | report spam | close Reply |
Steve Jobs was right...

Before the iTunes Music Store ... Steve Jobs had said it would be impossible to design the perfect DRM scheme ... someone will always find a way to get around it.

FairPlay was designed not so much to be bullet proof, but to show that there are honest people, who wouldn't mind paying for music if the restrictions were fair. To me, Apple's restrictions are the most lenient on the market and so far, I have not had a situation where I couldn't play or use a song I've purchased off iTunes.

I think people need to remember that this is not your music, it belongs to the record companies and if they aren't happy with the way things go they could easily make it worse for everyone involved. That's the problem with the creation of utilities like PyMusique. It only gives the record companies more of an argument to up the prices or restrict the "fairness" even further.

Thank god there's a company like Apple and a man like Steve Jobs involved in online distribution. They at least were able to get the record companies to be somewhat reasonable in their expectations of what is fair and what is not. And provide the music lovers with a system that works.

mjtomlin
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Oct 1999

0

03/23, 01:05pm | report spam | close Reply |
re: backed by someone

"Yup, my thought exactly when I first heard about these guys... so, assuming these guys *are* being backed by someone, who's more likely? MS? Napster? Record companies?"

How about Apple? It doesn't really matter who or why, it is actually in Apple's best interest to have these holes/flaws discovered so they can be patched and fixed.

testudo
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2001

0

03/23, 01:11pm | report spam | close Reply |
I love this

Cody Brocious, a Pennsylvania high school student working with Johansen, said they saw the project as 'necessary for the Linux community,' despite Apple's opposition."

Exactly how is it necessary for the Linux community to do access the web-store? How come its not necessary to access Napster? And then the bigger question. The Linux/Open source communities are always all up in arms over closed systems and preach about open formats and systems and such, yet they feel its essential to access the iTMS, which sells music in the proprietary AAC format (just like MP3, its owned by someone, so its proprietary, even if its also a standard). Shouldn't they all be trying to start their own store (well, since its the Open Source community, they'd be opening 68293 stores, all slightly different) and selling music in OGG format or something?

And since he came out with software to strip the DRM, why'd he need to write another piece of software? [Man, this is where I end up going on a rant about how, if all these 'programmers' could actually get together, and put together a NEW program or software, they could end up building grand new things, but, no, they spend their time beating a horse into the ground, or wondering whether they need to come up with another IRC client, but one where you could control the color of the text AND put in graphical smilies, because all the other clients give you the ability to do one or the other (or neither! the heathens!) so let's build another one rather than updating one of the 5400 others. OK, end of rant]

SomeToast
Senior User

Joined: Jan 1999

0

03/23, 01:45pm | report spam | close Reply |
re: I love this

And since he came out with software to strip the DRM, why'd he need to write another piece of software?

Really. Why didn't the guy just run the readily-available iTunes for Linux? He so cwazy!

testudo
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Aug 2001

0

03/23, 01:46pm | report spam | close Reply |
Re: backed

How about Apple? It doesn't really matter who or why, it is actually in Apple's best interest to have these holes/flaws discovered so they can be patched and fixed.

Not backed by apple. If apple wanted to find/fix the flaws, they wouldn't hire a guy who (a) wouldn't be hired by a big corp to secure DRM, because its against his 'principles', and (b) wouldn't hire a guy who'd publicize the flaw and post ways around it.

zdezyne
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Feb 2001

0

03/23, 01:56pm | report spam | close Reply |
Criminal?

If you read the news.com article DVD Jon says:

"The work I do is completely legal in my country," Johansen said in an e-mail interview. "Of course, I know very well that not doing anything illegal doesn't mean you won't be prosecuted (or) sued."

So essentially he's hiding behind some laws that must exist to protect him in Norway or wherever he is from. Does he even understand that acessing the ITMS via a different application other than iTunes is a direct violation of the ITMS user agreement? Personally, I think this dude should be made an example of. Lock him up in Gitmo or a prison with the general population. He could really be doing something good for the community instead he's just a glory hound.

MacPulse Zack
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Dec 2002

0

03/23, 02:36pm | report spam | close Reply |
Cough.

Cough.

bigpoppa206
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Jun 2003

0

03/23, 06:23pm | report spam | close Reply |
Uh, I hate to tell ya...

"It's not theft ... 160833 3/23/05, 10:45 am EST
They're not stealing music from ITMS, it has to be bought first. All that's happening is that their client isn't adding the DRM that iTunes adds after the purchased music is downloaded."

When you agree to purchase music from the iTMS you agree to that DRM also! It IS theft.

legacyb4
Mac Elite

Joined: May 2001

0

03/23, 07:45pm | report spam | close Reply |
Run over by a bus

I guess the best thing that could happen is he just gets run over by a bus or taxi... simpler than trying to prosecute!

a holck
Senior User

Joined: Jul 2001

0

03/23, 09:52pm | report spam | close Reply |
DRM in Open Source....

The reason he isnt applying DRM in his software is because it's Open Source. Apple screwed up when they choose to apply the DRM in the client side. If Jons group had coded a DRM applyer into the software it would take 5 mins to remove it from the source code afterwards, and you could then announce a compeding version without DRM....

lkrupp
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: May 2001

0

03/23, 10:48pm | report spam | close Reply |
Audiophiles

Every time I hear an "audiophile" go on about the difference between a CD and AAC or MP3 I get a big belly laugh. I'm old enough to remember when CD's first arrived on the scene. Audiophiles were aghast at such an abomination. These were the guys with 500lb granite turntables, vacuum tube amplifiers, Magnaplanar speakers, and oh-so-keen ears that were offended by the harsh sound of the compact disc. The CD couldn't capture the nuances of extreme upper harmonics because the sample rate wasn't fast enough and the conversion scale only used 16 bit words. All hail the Analog God. Now these same guys, and maybe their children or grandchildren, lament the advent of compression. Now they make their pronouncements to the unwashed masses about the superiority of CD's over MP3. What an absolute hoot!

The only thing worse than a self-righteous audiophile is a flaming irrational Mac zealot. Maybe not.

lkrupp
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: May 2001

0

03/23, 10:54pm | report spam | close Reply |
PyMusique for Mac

Doesn't anyone appreciate the irony that an OS X PyMusique client DOESN'T EXIST and probably never will!? So here we have a hack of Apple proprietary software that is Linux/Windows only! Maybe the Mac really is being marginalized!

ROTFLAMO!

Big Mac
Clinically Insane

Joined: Oct 2000

0

03/24, 04:33am | report spam | close Reply |
Re: PyMusique for Mac

I had no idea this product was only for Linux and not for the Mac. I naturally assumed it was an OS X application the way the sites have covered the story. It would be nice of Apple to provide a Linux version of iTunes, but, of course, Linux geeks would invariable scream about it not being open source.

z10n
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Oct 2003

0

03/24, 10:25pm | report spam | close Reply |
wow, morons abound

Moron #1: "Seeing as how fervent DVD Jon is in breaking Apple DRM, yet never even dares touch Windows DRM, it does make you wonder, doesn't it, where his loyalties lie -- or rather, who signs his paychecks, eh?"

Or, he could justl like cracking DRM for the fun of it. Not everything is an apple vs microsoft issue. Likewise, just because you buy a product from apple doesn't mean you suddenly have to lick SJ's feet or worship everything apple does. Suggesting that DVD Jon is working for microsoft, just because he's doing something you don't like, is completely retarded. Please go back to licking your iPod, or at least grow a brain before you post.

Moron #2: "I have a challenge to DVD Jon - or any other cracker wannabe - why instead of breaking the DRM you honor it."

DVD Jon is so named because he cracked the DVD protection scheme. Not only has he done that, but he's cracked numerous other protection schemes, all in the name of making software available to linux users. Calling him a "cracker wannabe" has got to be the dumbest comment I think I've ever heard. Likewise, suggesting that he write an iTunes clone for no apparent reason is equally stupid. Translation: "I don't like him, he has no honor in stripping DRM, blah, blah, blah." Yet where is the honor in apple imposing DRM when it is unwanted? What is the honor in apple being the b**** of the RIAA when at some level, they know it isn't right?

The truth is, it isn't about honor or right and wrong. It's about creating solutions for people. What people choose to do with those solutions is their own responsiblity, not the author's.

Moron #3:"I hope these guys fry for this. They are ruining it for the rest of us."

Nope. Sorry, but nothing is ruined. Did apple stop selling music? Nope. Did your computer blow up? Nope. Did the world end? Nope. In a world where it takes a total of five minutes to fire up Acqlite and download any song I want for free, there is no reason at all to be bitching about someone cracking some DRM. The RIAA knows that people pirate and crack iTMS songs, and yet they still haven't pulled the plug. For one obvious reason: they are still making money from the people who can't be bothered and don't know any better who continue to buy music from iTMS in the normal way. And that will NEVER change. Heck, the RIAA is probably happy that they are making money at all from online music, because they remember what it was like back when everyone downloaded through Napster. Money makes the world go round, and the RIAA sees enough of it to let iTMS live, regardless if the DRM is cracked.

Moron #4: "Does he even understand that acessing the ITMS via a different application other than iTunes is a direct violation of the ITMS user agreement?"

(A) He did not agree to the iTMS user agreement, since he is using a different program.
(B) EULAs are not

z10n
Fresh-Faced Recruit

Joined: Oct 2003

0

03/24, 10:26pm | report spam | close Reply |
cont

(B) EULAs are not legally binding.

Moron #5: "When you agree to purchase music from the iTMS you agree to that DRM also"

Show me exactly where in the agreement it says that. Show me the popup in iTMS warning me that I have to accept DRM.

Show More Comments

Login Here

toggle

Network Headlines

02/10	Apple sells scaled-back 13-inch MacBook...
02/10	Apple sues Motorola over alleged Qualcomm...
02/10	Leaks: whole MacBook Pro line to drop...
02/10	Jobs did serve on Bush export council...
02/10	Amazon could have Kindle Fire 9-inch...

Show All

02/10	Apple sues Motorola over alleged Qualcomm...
02/10	Leaks: whole MacBook Pro line to drop...
02/10	Amazon could have Kindle Fire 9-inch...
02/09	Google said making self-branded wireless...
02/09	NOAA switches support from BlackBerry...

Show All

02/09	Apple explores environment-sensitive...
02/08	Paul McCartney to perform live concert...
02/06	Microsoft prepping Dynamics CRM apps...
02/03	iBooks Author update clarifies EULA...
02/02	Bug in iTunes Match may switch 'explicit...

Show All

02/10	$380 off refurbished 2.8GHz Mac Pro...
02/09	iHome Dual Alarm Clock for Apple iPod...
02/08	Save 69% on SanDisk Cruzer 32GB USB...
02/07	Refurb. Olympus 14MP Digital Camera...
02/06	17-inch, 2.2GHz MacBook Pro, cut to...

Show All

toggle

Hackers re-enable PyMusique access to iTMS

updated 08:15 am EST, Wed March 23, 2005

PyMusique access to iTMS

Related Articles

Recent Articles

AAC quality is so...

... and so it begins

You still have to BUY

AAC quality

hmm

hmm

Re; hmm

It's not the music...

5% figure

Buy Schmy�

Laugh

Re: Hmm

It's not stealing...

well that didn't work

Gives Records Companies

Excellent

Re: didn't work

Audio quality

It's not theft ...

Broken

uh uh ElRay

I'll just keep saying it

apple4ever:

Challenge

nooooooo

Audiophiles ...

How about this?

Back on topic

Zink said it...

Steve Jobs was right...

re: backed by someone

I love this

re: I love this

Re: backed

Criminal?

Cough.

Uh, I hate to tell ya...

Run over by a bus

DRM in Open Source....

Audiophiles

PyMusique for Mac

Re: PyMusique for Mac

wow, morons abound

cont

Login Here

Register for our weekly email newsletter:

Connect tools:

Subscribe

to our RSS

Follow us

on Twitter

10 Most Read

10 Most Discussed

MacNN Marketplace