Apple settles lawsuit with student over Tiger leak
updated 05:35 pm EST, Wed March 23, 2005
Lawsuit settled over Tiger
Apple said on Wednesday that it has , the next version of its operating system. The defendeant, who distributed copies of Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger on a file-sharing Web site, has settled a case brought by Apple last December but is still the subject of a criminal investigation. As a student member of the Apple Developer Connection, Steigerwald was given early test copies of Tiger, which Apple says is set for release by June (although rumors say it could be introduced as early as next month).
"While Apple will always protect its innovations, it is not our desire to send students to jail," said Apple spokesman Steve Dowling. "We are pleased that Mr. Steigerwald has taken responsibility for his actions and that we can put this lawsuit behind us," according to a statement given to Reuters.
Earlier this year, Apple co-founder Steve Wozniak spoke out against Apple. Wozniak, who said that he would contribute to the students' defense fund, called the student's actions an "unintentional oversight" and said that the interviewed student appears "to be one of the most honest people on this planet. I have to question who is most right in this case. I wish that Apple could find some way to drop the matter. In my opinion, more than appropriate punishment has already been dealt out."
As part of the settlement, Steigerwald said he would pay an undisclosed sum to Apple and that he would provide no further comment on the lawsuit beyond a prepared statement he offered to Reuters. "Although I did not mean to do any harm, I realize now that my actions were wrong and that what I did caused substantial harm to Apple and for that I am truly sorry," said the 22-year old, who graduated from North Carolina State University with a degree in computer engineering last December.
Steigerwald is also the subject of a criminal investigation by the U.S. Attorney's office, but is "working toward a resolution with the federal government," according to the Reuters report. In its December lawsuit against the "Tiger leakers," Apple claimed that two different versions of Mac OS X were made available on the Internet on or about Oct. 30 and Dec. 8, 2004. The software was distributed via BitTorrent, a popular file-sharing technology that can quickly distribute large files by downloading portions from multiple users simultaneously.










cool!
03/23, 09:16pm reply
and good for them!
bigpoppa206
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Jun 2003
predictable.
03/23, 10:20pm reply
Funny the way all the doom sayers were taking Apple to task for ruining this poor helpless students life.
OF COURSE this is what would happen. No one's life is ruined, they just scared the Heck out of him to get him to think more next time something like this comes up.
gudin
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: May 2000
Re: predictable
03/24, 12:16am reply
OF COURSE this is what would happen. No one's life is ruined, they just scared the Heck out of him to get him to think more next time something like this comes up.
Hey, teaching him what real life is like. School's paying off for this guy.
LouZer
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Nov 2000
...
03/24, 04:52am reply delete
Well, I think it's a little screwed up that he has to pay Apple [b]and[/b] stay quiet about this. He should be able to say whatever the heck he wants. I don't think censorship should be [b]ANY[/b] part of a legal agreement.
Gabriel Morales
Joined:
I guess...
03/24, 04:54am reply delete
Bold doesn't work here, huh?
Gabriel Morales
Joined:
Bold and censhorship
03/24, 08:28am reply
You need to use standard HTML tags to do bold, not the UBB tags.
Oh, and censhorship is part of most legal agreements (h***, his original agreement that he broke in the first place said he couldn't talk or distribute Tiger). Companies aren't about to give someone money and then let that person say bad things about them. You want to say bad things about a company, go to court.
testudo
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Aug 2001
er.... censorship?
03/24, 11:59am reply
it's not censorship if a private company wants to keep private information private. It's also not censorship if it's the result of an agreement. . . The guy agreed to settle, and part of that agreement was a decision not to divulge this info in the future.
censorship is when the government prevents people from saying things it doesn't want people to say, and under threat of the use of state power.
gudin
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: May 2000