Briefly: IE struggles, REALbasic Olympics, IMG DVD
updated 02:45 pm EST, Mon February 14, 2005
REALbasic Olympics
In brief: Microsoft reportedly held a secret Webcast with some of its closest partners to discuss ways in which the company might improve its Internet Explorer browser and , a subscription service featuring game demos, shareware, updates, add-ons, trailers, cheaters, and more.






Fresh-Faced Recruit
Joined: Oct 1999
as ye sow...
... and all that. They tied a browser to the OS, someone's bright idea of cementing market share by necessity. They they made sure there was an unbroken chain of scripting (ScriptX, DirectX, VB, etc) from the cloud to your apps to your hard drive so they could boast of integration. They didn't think through the security implications of all this, and are now about four OS iterations deep in a system that still fundamentally is designed to let anyone on the planet take control of your data.
And betting the whole thing on DLLs and registries doesn't help either. With all the effort they've put into failing cute things - .NET as a global standard, Passport, and six lifestyle-custom flavors of the current OS... they could bring it all back to providing a stable, scalable, secure platform.
Look, how many smart people are there at Microsoft that can't see that you need the same security designs that were in Unix and then Linux and now Mac OSX and draw a line in the sand and make it secure. If a tenth as many people at Apple can make OSX work and be secure and be backwards compatible with OS9 - can't they? Or how about patches that matter - How terribly hard can it be for them to (1) add a popup blocker like Safari (2) add a scripting filter like iCab (3) add a first-launch check like OSX?
Seems like they still feel they can do whatever they want, throw enough money at the problem, and everyone will accept it. Or maybe they're just too big and now it's sheer mass and good old inertia that threatens them, not monopoly per se.