Please, Apple's a bunch of crooks lately. Even Micro$oft supports their software for longer than Apple does as of late.

Wow. On a dual 2 GHz G5 (fast broadband connection), Safari is noticeably faster than it was before. Great work, Apple!

And Safari is based on open source KHTML. So Apple is s******* us with software that isn't even theirs. How lame. It looks to me like the new "features" in this release are actually compatibility fixes that should have been in the 1.0 release. But if you want a browser that works like it should, you have to pay. What a crock of BS.

this browser is just RIPE to download 10-15 minute live jams.

so does that mean you need a dual 2 ghz G5 processor with at least 512 megs of memory to use Safari snappily??? What did we do before we had such fast processors?

Didn't Java Applets die with Disco and the Pet Rock? ;-)
But hey, how 'bout Janet Jackson's breast?

Pith Helmet Fix For Safari 1.2:

open /Library/Application Support/SIMBL/Plugins/
Right click (control+click) PithHelmet.bundle and select show package contents
Open the Contents folder and from there open the info.plist file in either textedit or Property List Editor if you have the dev tools installed
Find where it says MaxSafariBundleVersion and change the value to 125
Save and restart safari. thats it, now it works.

"Can I get a 'hooray!' for boobies!?"

HOOOORAAAAYY.

Question: Was it or Wasn't it staged? (the flash that is)

and other vendors. Try FireBird, Mozilla, or even OmniWeb.

Um - It doesn't allow me to use Tabs unless I have "always show tabs" checked in my preferences.

When I hit CMD-T it just gives me a blank window and deletes any others I had.

-Jason

Apple whined pitifully during the Microsoft antitrust trial. Reality check: the newest IE runs on Windows versions that go back more than five years; newest Safari requires newest Mac OS X ONLY!

how much you wanna bet this "update" is free for jaguar users eventually? give apple some credit you bozos- they don't have 55,000 employees like microsoft (who i might add still haven't added pop up blockers to IE and security holes as big as texas still exist)

eventually this will be free, so shut up. it is a browser for chrissakes. it isn't logic audio or final cut!!

If you don't like it vote with your dollars then and use Windows of Linux.

I'm running 10.2.8 and was wondering if Safari 1.2 is fully compatible with Citibank yet. Thanks

Reality check: Microsoft is a *much* bigger company than Apple, with a far larger user base.

How come you're not complaining that MS doesn't support IE6 on Win95 and Win98??? Yes they are older than OS X 10.2 but it's the same idea. Plus some of the features in Safari 1.1.1 can't be back-ported to 10.2 but I'm sure that fixes in CSS and anything else that is possible will be back-ported (if it hasn't been done already). Calm down. You don't seem in a hurray to update to 10.3 so why should Apple hurry to back-port this for you???

...for me in 10.3 on two longstanding problem websites...

Finally after 3 years of waiting, struggle & compromise it appears I don't HAVE to use a peecee any more to do what I used to in OS-9...

Can I finally call OS-X a true upgrade...? I'd say it's there...

Ha ha! ain't so cocky now that someone's pointed out your poor reading skills, hein?

sad...

Anyone got it tivo the half time - I had to BBQ didn't see it.. can someone post it some where -?? please...

i am not so smart i wanna see jhanet jackson boobie with star pasty and i gonna post it up ons some mac nn do'nt got s*** to do with nothing mac i sure do like me my neon lit up g5.

go to pic 6 of 8...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/other_sports/us_sport/photo_galleries/3450553.stm

Why in the world do people like tabbing between links on a web page. Most pages have so many links you'd have tab for a minute to get anywhere. Plus, it makes tabbing between form controls even more annoying...

"Reality check: the newest IE runs on Windows versions that go back more than five years; "

No, you are wrong, the newest IE does NOT run on Windows 98 or earlier. Windows 98 is just barely 5 years old.

IE6 not only runs on Win98, it is considered a required critical update as older releases of IE are no longer supported by security fixes.

Hey, let's not forget MS has announced they are NO LONGER making a standalone version of IE for windows. Which means if you want IE 6.5 or 7, you better save up for XP SP2 or longhorn.

Bless you! I wasn't really upset about having to use Mozilla until it was patched, but this saves me the trouble of updating my Mozilla bookmarks and prefs and everything else.

Thank you, thank you, thank you!

M$ was officially judged a monopoly because they tied the browser to the OS. Which turned out to be a bogus "reason." Now, they've done the same thing again, but obviously feel confident because they are only doing exactly what apple is doing... forcing a paid OS upgrade to be able to use the browser.

Except, microapplesoft has legions of pathetic, rabid dog fans who will drown out anyone voicing concern about their tactics.

So where's the Macnn story that Apple has terminated development on Safari for 10.2 users. This isn't exactly System 7.5 you know.

What did Apple update??? Yes, Safari is a little faster than Firebird, Camino or other browsers, but not that much. And, Safari has few of the key user features of other browsers, such as history, image and site-specific cookie management. Plus, none of the sites that I access regularly that didn't work properly or at all in Safari 1.1.1 -- Citibank online, Westlaw, NY Daily News online, etc. -- works any better in version 1.2. I will stick with Firebird for the time being!

So where's the Macnn story that Apple has terminated development on Safari for 10.2 users. This isn't exactly System 7.5 you know.

Well, if they posted that they'd get lots of complaints from readers stating (quite correctly) that it IS NOT NEWS, as in "the last release of Safari didn't work on 10.2 either, so what's new here?"

can't remember where I read this, maybe Hyatt's blog, but Safari 1.1 and later require certain OS components that don't exist in 10.2.

does Safari 1.0 run any worse in 10.2 then it did when you bought it? was there written promises of upgrades for free?

it would be cool if they could do an upgrade for 10.2 users (probably be a pretty big update... since it has to update part of the OS as well)

As for compatibility with some websites, use the "Report bugs to Apple" feature under the "Safari" application menu.
better then what exists to report bugs to Microsoft about IE... (which of course, is now killed)

Guess what. John Kerry is a decorated war veteran who served with distinction. George Bush went AWOL during his brief service (Absent WithOut Leave) and ironically, is leading our armed forces into two simultaneous conflicts (I won't mention how they LIED about Iraq having WMD just to serve their own cause).

Which person would you rather have leading our military?

You Republicans have more money than brains.

What the f*** does this have to do with Safari? get out of hear you political troll.

One would have hoped by now that Safari would have more features. But I have to keep reminding myself that Safari wasn't intended for people like me who actually care about the latest browser features.

Panther users: don't worry about it. 1.2 is basically a bug fix. Move along, nothing to see.

This browser is just getting better and better, but one thing which hasn't been fixed is printing: Every time I print a page with forms (buttons and popup menus etc) they all get screwed up on output. Is there a workaround? Are Apple aware that their software can't print? Other than that - it's a bloody cool browser! I don't care what anyone says.