who in their right mind would waste their time on this.

Theres plenty of other products out there.

What does it take for them to write a couple of lines? The say they do not believe there is a market, but it appears this is a persons thought and not market research driven. If they had indeed look into it they would have relized it would not have required anything for them to add support. Lame.

This is a POS little camera. It supports a max resolution that Apple had in its digital camera over 8 years ago (which was also a POS by todays standards).

I would curse anyone who got it for me.

Also I am not sure how easy it is for this to be supported on Mac OS X. It looks like they use some none standard storage method on the stupid thing that their software interfaces with.

Leave this company behind. This camera sucks, just like the Casio Digicam of 1997. Hint- go to Amazon.com, buy a Sony Ericsson t610 phone. It takes pictures and it has Bluetooth and it syncs very well with iSync. And with the 200 dollar rebate- the phone is free. And somehow I imagine the pictures the Sony phone takes are as good as this crappy camera discussed here...

Send an email to support@ioexperts.com to have them add support to their drivers.

it's support@ioxperts.com (no "e")

There are so many really good cameras out there - why bother with this silly toy? OK, so it's cheap, but that seems to be the predominant mindset of the company that makes this camera.
Erich

If they wrote the camera software to support the "general purpose media" something or other it would have worked on the mac.

Eff 'em.

that I've never heard of it, even back when I was researching digital camera and buying one. Sounds like a real quality device...

My guess is only windows people have low enough standards for anything that takes pictures this awful.

Not being able to use it is like being told you can't drive a Trabaunt.