toggle

AAPL Stock: 530.38 ( + 0.26 )

Tech: anti-spam bill; 'Net crime crackdown; ...

updated 02:25 pm EST, Fri November 21, 2003

Anti-spam bill vote coming


Afternoon tech news: The U.S. Congress could vote as early as this afternoon, would end more than six years of failed attempts to enact a federal law , according to industry experts.


by MacNN Staff

(7)

TAGS :

 industry
toggle

Comments

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    HA!

    Outlawing spam will be about as effective as drinking with a fork.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Useless Anti-Spam law

    All this law will do is to legalize mainsleaze spam . Mainsleaze spam = "legit" companies (not p***, 419, viagra, drugs, MLM scams. Mainsleazers will be allowed to spam you until you cry uncle and unsubscribe. Just think about every business in the world spamming your email until it bleeds. It *WILL* happen. Opt-in is the ONLY way to control spam. Then again no law is worth anything if it is not enforced. Plus USA laws mean very little to other countries.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    How so?

    Spam is the one thing, that if outlawed, by definition of what spam is, leads you directly to the culpret.

    It's the unsoliceted part that will be a very large gray area. The annoyed will have to prove they didn't ask for it.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Worthless anti-spam law

    As an earlier comment mentioned, no law is worth anything unless it is enforced. This law has no enforcement provisions probably and no mechanism for tracking down spammers. What if the unsubscribe links on spams don't work? How do they catch address spoofers? What about spam that originates outside the U.S.?

    This law may be worse than nothing, because it now allows spam companies to use their lawyers and this law against people who sue them for spam, because the definition for spam is so loose.

    Typical U.S. Congress and more specifically usual for a Republican controlled one.

    - Maclectic

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    why doesn't

    why doesn't the US government point the blame at the software companies (such as micro$oft) that release weak, bug ridden insecure software and punish them instead of blaming the end user? oh right- i forgot, we have a corporate c*** sucking president and attorney general. nevermind.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Democrats are bought too

    Remember it isn't just the Republicans that are allowing M$ to make insecure software. Clinton allowed M$ to spew out its insecure software for all of his presidency too. This isn't about Republican vs. Democrat. It is big business vs the regular guy/gal. USA has the best government that money can buy.

  1. MacNN.com Reader

    Fresh-Faced Recruit

    Joined: Jul 2001

    0

    Yep

    Our government is only bipartisan when it comes to holding its hand out to the corporate world.

    Anyway, m$ sayting they are tough on spam is just a myth, here are 9 more:
    http://www.clickz.com/feedback/buzz/article.php/3112021

Login Here

Not a member of the MacNN forums? Register now for free.

 
close
Photo
toggle

Network Headlines

toggle

Most Popular

MacNN Sponsor

Recent Reviews

iHome iW2 AirPlay speaker

iHome generally isn't known as a luxury brand when it comes to audio, but it is prolific -- the company's docks and speakers are every ...

Logitech Ultrathin Keyboard Cover

One of the iPad's main weaknesses has always been productivity. It's not a question of apps; while it has taken a little time for a na ...

Logitech UE Air Speaker

If maybe a little more slowly than Apple would like, AirPlay is becoming a staple of the wireless speaker market for iOS devices. The ...

toggle

Most Commented